
Holocaust Memorial in Miami, Florida
Photo Credit to Prazuquantel - Flicker
The issue that has been lighting up keyboards from around the world is the use of 'social networks', like Facebook, MySpace, even YouTube to promote often times a particular ideological position on religion, politics, history. You name it, it pretty much can be found. Just when do subscriber groups cross the line and what should be done about them?
CNET
From Christian Science Monitor
The problem we have with sites that published false information on the internet or even in the media, is that if false information is repeated enough times it becomes an 'accepted truth.' An example is the Irish youth who added a quote to a author on Wikipedia as a hoax. Well, it stayed there and finally was picked up by news organizations who did not check their sources and it was published. The hoax was uncovered and the mainstream media had to apologize. The problem we are looking at is the ethics which we all hold to be self evident in anything we see in print. But, this is not the case with hate groups who spew so much vile speech into the arena of the internet. Yes, they have a right to their opinions, but they are not being held accountible for false, misleading or slanderous speech to include hate speech and death threats. No one is taking recourse. Here in the United States the Supreme Court has ruled that you cannot stand up in a theatre and scream fire, it endangers people. I concur with the court here and would like to see it applied to the internet which is a free for all right now.
No, I am not advocating complete censorship. I am talking about speech that is used in any form to promote violence and injury to others.
So we must speak out when we see it. I can certainly see where ethical application of the true intent of 'freedom of speech' will someday end up in the courts.
I look forward to that ruling.
1 comment:
Truly an interesting dilemma. Freedom of speech vs. disinformation in a nutshell.
Hate is specifically addressed in Facebook's terms of use yet I see countless specific examples every time I turn around while using the site. Curiously I've yet to find a report capability attached to most of these instances. They have one for photos but not for the myriad quizzes for example.
I took what I thought might be a silly quiz to determine what ruthless dictator I was in a past life. Obviously in retrospect I should have known what was coming but it still struck me hard when every set of questions contained an option for killing the Jew in one manner or another. Those answers were obviously there to garner the "Hitler" quiz result but it still felt like it was promoting anti-Semitism or that it was , in the very least, making lite of the Holocaust.
Additionally, this was the first time I was ever presented with the option of giving a reason when removing an application on Facebook. This made me wonder if it wasn't specifically designed to gauge reaction.
Post a Comment